Pages

Showing posts with label Ray Keiser. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ray Keiser. Show all posts

2021-01-14

The Rise and Fall of Amazon

 The Rise and Fall of Amazon

Ray W. Keiser
January 14, 2021

Less than 27 years, that's all it takes.

Jeff Bezos founded Amazon in 1994.  It went through a couple of name changes at the beginning, but the core of one of the first Internet bookstores went online July 5, 1994.

Some of you (especially those born after 1990) will have to read that last paragraph again to catch the full meaning: Amazon was founded as a book store.  All of that other stuff came later.

Bezos chose books as a product because he knew that they would be easy to distribute, and could be sold all over the world. His business model was based on the easy sharing of knowledge and ideas.

Over time, Amazon began adding new products: CDs and DVDs, video games, Kindle tablets, clothing, etc.  Its website became a model for how online shopping could be done, by suggesting related and alternate items and making re-orders easy. It began adding web services for business partners, beginning with A9, a web search and advertising research arm, then expanding into the application and hosting cloud services that Amazon Web Services (AWS) is known for. They've acquired various companies, from Zappos to Whole Foods. They added the ability for partners to sell their own wares within Amazon's marketplace. They helped drive the industry in digital and streaming services, starting with e-books, and later music, video, and audiobooks. And, of course, they introduced the popular Amazon Prime option to help drive customer loyalty.

Amazon isn't perfect: the aforementioned A9 service has since been dismantled, its technology folded back into Amazon's main site.  And they have had some bad calls (the Fire Phone was a noteworthy disaster).

But for the most part, Bezos and his team have made shrewd decisions, time and time again accurately predicting market directions and gaining enviable strategic footholds. And in the process, Bezos became one of the wealthiest men in the world (as of this writing, he was just dethroned to #2, by Elon Musk).

More prominently in the news, AWS recently ousted the conservative social network Parler from its network, with only 24 hours notice. Parler's crime: allowing users to speak their minds without censorship. Oh, the horror!

Bear in mind that this was in the same week that Facebook and Twitter began cleansing their user base of "offensive" accounts. Google and Apple joined Amazon in removing Parler's free app from their stores.  Make no mistake, this was a coordinated effort.  But Amazon's actions were the most devastating blow, and it remains to be seen whether Parler will recover.

Compared to Facebook and Twitter, Parler is a relatively small fish in the social networking ocean. Amazon's actions are tantamount to a landlord revoking the lease on a local mom & pop grocery store, simply because the landlord is friends with the local Wal-Mart manager, and doesn't like some of the things the grocer's customers say.

And they did it with only 24 hours notice.

Note: I don't agree with all of the things that Parler's users were saying.  I abhor racism, and don't condone hate directed at anyone.  But I can disagree with the things said, while supporting their right to say them. If you don't understand how terrifying Amazon's actions are, you truly don't understand the concept of free speech, and how important it was to America's founders. Supporting free speech means supporting the right for people to say things that are uncomfortable, disrespectful, offensive, and downright repugnant.

All of this is to say that it took less than 27 years for Jeff Bezos and Amazon to go from a bookseller, helping in the easy exchange of knowledge and ideas, to the preeminent censor of "dangerous" ideas on the Internet.  Amazon has risen to become a business powerhouse, but in the process has fallen into moral decay.

- RWK

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Amazon

2016-10-27

Why I am Voting Third-Party for President in 2016

Vote for me, vote for me
If I am elected, this is how it will be.

I'll work for global peace
And the sweet release
Of the love and human kindness in us all.

I would give all I've got
You just give me a shot
Somehow, I know that I can win the fall.


Chicago, "Vote For Me" (Robert Lamm, 1977)

by Raymond Keiser, senior editor, The Pharos Project for Patriotic Conservatism

Let me start off by unequivocally stating, I am a die-hard constitutional conservative.  I care very much about this country, and the direction it is headed.  Eight years of Obama have been destructive on the economic, military, and moral fabric of our nation.

Hillary Clinton's criminal actions clearly disqualify her from office.  She has repeatedly sold out our country's security and sovereignty, all for the sake of power and money.  She has shown a blatant disregard for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the American people. We cannot afford to give her four more years to finish what Obama has started.

On the other hand, I'm not particularly fond of Donald Trump; I think he's pompous and boorish. But while he might be unpleasant, those reasons don't disqualify him. I don't like him, but I could almost manage to hold my nose and vote for him.


But I have decided to vote third-party.


Yes, you read that line correctly: I plan to vote third-party.  Before I get bombarded with hateful comments about "handing the election to [Clinton or Trump]", let me explain my logic.

Firstly, I live in Mississippi, which is a solidly red Republican state. For my state, a Trump win is a shoo-in.  The last time Mississippi voted for a Democrat president was 1976, when southerner Jimmy Carter won by less than 2%; in the 21st century, Mississippi has gone Republican in every election by double-digits. I say again with certainty: Trump will win Mississippi.

Second, elections in the United States are not decided by popular majority.  They are decided by the electoral college, which is awarded based on the electors of each state.

With those two facts in mind, it's easy to see that on election day, Trump will have the 6 electors of Mississippi, no matter how I vote – or even if I vote.  This is a foregone conclusion.


So what's a conservative to do?


As I said, my vote for Trump means little.

On the other hand, many, many Americans -- on both sides of the aisle -- have expressed a desire for a solid third- (or fourth, or fifth) party to break the Republican/Democrat hegemony that has defined American politics for over a century.

We do have alternative parties, but none of them have managed to gain enough traction to break the gridlock, and many voters don't even know they exist.  I agree with many planks of the Libertarian Party platform, but I can't stomach their candidates in this election.  For a conservative, two tickets rise to the top: the Constitution Party (Castle/Bradley) or Independent (McMullin/Johnson).  Both tickets feature honorable candidates with constitutional and moral platforms, and a conservative should have no qualms about voting for either. In my case, I am voting for Darrell Castle (McMullin isn't on the ballot, and Mississippi doesn't allow write-in votes).


What will it matter?  They won't win!


Please understand that I am under no illusions that a third-party candidate will win this election, nor do I think that my opinion will sway enough votes to change the outcome. Next January, either Clinton or Trump will be inaugurated (after what I have no doubt will be highly contested election results), and my vote won't directly impact this.  As I established earlier, this is because of where I live.

But third-parties are not on the ballot in all states.  For example, in Mississippi, the Constitution Party is on the ballot, but the Independent (McMullin) ticket is not.  In many cases, you can vote for them as a write-in.

Write-in ballots are often given a bad rap.  Many people see them as throw-away votes. However, in most states, in order for a party to be granted full ballot recognition in one election, they must garner a small percentage of the vote (often 1%) in the previous election. In other words: a write-in party in 2016 could easily be a full ballot ticket in 2020. Even for those third-parties that are on the ballot this year, they must maintain a minimum number of votes to remain on the ballot next time.

The upshot of all that is that while my third-party vote may not sway the result of this year's election, it could help make sure that that party is available next time.

So what do I do?


If my reasoning has not persuaded you, then please, by all means, go vote your conscience.  Or don't vote at all.  It's a free country.  Thank you for taking the time to read my blog.

However, if my reasoning seems logical to you, please consider the following:

  • My logic is based on the fact that I live in a state that is not "in play" this year.  If you live in a so-called "swing" state (FL, OH, PA, etc) or a state that is "undecided" (IA, TX, AZ, etc), then please ignore what I've said and vote your conscience -- unless you plan to vote for Hillary, in which case please stay home (kidding!).
  • If you're considering voting third-party, please research the available options.  Also, check your state elections website or the tools listed below, and determine which candidates are on your local ballot.
  • If your preferred candidate isn't on the ballot, and you're considering a write-in vote, do more research, to determine what the rules are on write-in candidates in your state.  Not all states allow write-in candidates, and most of those that do will only accept "pre-filed" candidate tickets.  Also note that some states have "sore loser" laws, which prevent write-in votes for candidates who failed to get their party's nomination (e.g. Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders).

Thank you for your time, and God Bless America!
R W Keiser

2016-10-20

Welcome to our re-launch!

It's been a long time coming, but our website is finally back up!

Due to a flood a while back at our previous provider, our site was taken down.  Unfortunately, in the process we discovered that all the backups were also damaged (due to such issues, our previous web hosting provider has since gone out of business).

We have been working for over a year to recover the data directly from the hard drives.  This isn't easy, because the data was striped across multiple drives.  This effort continues to go on.

For a while, we intended to hold off on re-launching the site until we had all the old data (or as much as we can get) recovered, to try and replicate the old site.  However, since this has taken much longer than expected, we decided to launch the site and restore the data as we can.

Sorry if the site seems pretty bare-bones to begin with, but we'll be adding more content and features as we go.

Again, welcome to our site, and thanks for visiting!

Ray W Keiser, Chief Editor